SIDHU's OPPERTUNISTIC AND DOUBLE-STANDARD POLITICS..........

Navjot Sngh Sidhu has emerged as a laughing stock character used by the party that marketed his joker like messmerizing capability as a pliable pyaada (sepoy) in the game of political chess. I am sure THE GREAT INDIAN CIRCUS which has lost its sheen over the years to put the public into hillarious bouts of laughter should have hired him. Anything more to be expected of Sidhu in practical life outside the circus arena, then borders on monotonous and sickening repeat of what he thinks is his charisma. The rhetoric then starts sucking into the audience which in any case has by such a time better understood his double-standard pointed and sharply fired salvos.

The supposedly professed saviour of the downtroden with his wide-mouthed ornamental vocablury (which are his pet-" emotion arousing " high and forceful sounding decibels) must realize the futility of oft- repeated slogans in trying to get away from the ghost of his own shady and disgusting past. On one hand Sidhu never tires in advocating justice to the common man, on the other hand he forgets he himself is an accused and has used all powerful means and money power apart from his own official position to deny justice to the poor family who lacks all charisma, power(money and political), the services of great orators like Arun Jaitely in exploiting the loopholes in law and valiently walking free without a semblence of remorse. It sounds a very humiliaiting gesture that he pushed out a 65 year old man from his car in a fit of parking rage, blowed fists, pushed him down on the road and then if this was not enough took his car keys before victoriously walking away. The man later died in the hospital.

Having evaded justice and smilingly patting himself that this was what happens everywhere and was a normal occurance in a fit of rage; not even meeting the family of the victim once or ever be sorry for what he has done-- the man with the inherently displaced and dispositioned quota of guts is a bad example to the civilised world, the parliament which he unfortunately is elected to, to the judicial turn of events which by his particular case exemplifies a differnnt set of rules for the blue-eyed boys of our misinterprated spirit of democracy. Resigning and then getting elected two months later with the same forcefuly manipulated rhetoric and hoo-haa oratory, getting back to various t.v. shows, thanks to his savvy obsessed anchors the man is undettered and unfazed for he knows his armour of jokes and prose will do the wonders again.

It is for the people of his constituency to realise the folly in electing him . More than any service to common man---be it his dharna against price-rise, it is more of the immunity and high-public relation contacts that are going to delay him from clutches that hold any-other guilty in the way it should. But it must be remembered in the interest of our poetic master --"kaath ki haandi baar-baar nahii chhartti"......which means ....."one can not befool all the people all the time." His recent agitation where his turban loosened was a shameful piece of theatre to unsuccessfully heat-up public sentiments.

Here it needs to be mentioned that the author of this write-up was once a die-hard fan of Sidhu even noting down what he quotes, but the mockery that followed and the twisting of the case which in the first instance is as crystal clear as it could be, the denial of justice to the backward -not at all savvy kind or media friendly victims changed the author's perception.

I don't understand where are Barkha Dutts and Sagarika Ghoshs, who do not miss an attempt to help nurse a cause in the form of so called media-trial and justice to the needy campaigns......or are their some mutual equations .........

ANYWAYS, .....I HAVE FAITH ...........MEAR BHARAT MAHAAN................................and that justice shall trickle.... till then I resolved not to watch his T.V. shows mostly sponsored by N.DT.V. who have earned a good reputation of highlighting the detracked cases of the poor and helpless but for obvious commitments choose to ignore this particular case.